Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@Codex404 Nope, but I do sometimes make it cry with badly written custom filters xD
-
@mnxoid oh that's nasty, you're using 3x+ more RAM & CPU than you should for that
Just stick with uBlock origin, it blocks everything and uses way less resources than the other two bloated ones. Trust me, your loading times will thank you. -
@svgPhoenix I'll go with disabling them for a while just to see whether I'll feel the difference. Not sure if I'm going to give them up completely though.
-
@mnxoid
uBlock Origin + uMatrix and/or NoScript
Having both uMatrix and NoScript isn't that necessary and on mobile it's sometimes bit hard 😂
I love the feature of uBlock to block specific elements on a site ♡ -
@netikras Regular laptop screen, shouldn't have too big of a dpi... Console showed lots of errors because of blocked urls. It's strange actually that a css got into the list, but maybe there is something css-fishy going on the js side
Well yeah. He is right!
Give that man some HUGE FUCKING COOKIES!
So, you may know this already...But fuck CNET once again! Don't get me wrong, even if I loved the auto-playing video ads I would still be angry af. The site loads with a decent layout at first, but then in a second it changes and all I get is a pile of shit broken because of some <sarcasm>really great</sarcasm> CSS.
P.S. Yeah, I know it's probably my ad blocker killing something that is vital for the site to keep it's shape, but I don't care about that at all. I'll never give it up. (Or let it down, for that matter)
rant
first_rant
css
layout
joke
cnet
adblock