I've had my report invaded recently.

One of the other testers made the choice to show me great disrespect by editing it, because he found a mistake in it.
For one, the fucker should've told _me_ that I have a typo, instead of correcting it himself.

It's !a fucking collaboration. I have been the one who found && documented the issue. Provided all the necessary details. Had done all the work. But this fucker makes changes in the report as if trying to portray it as a collaboration. 'Look at me, I'm being helpful'. No, fucker. You've entered _my_ domain. You have no claims here.
_My_ report, _my_ responsibility.

Now, you _might_ think that a correction was still necessary. Well, sure, I'm !claiming that I'm perfect. On a _rare_ occasion, I do have a tiny mistake.

Here's the second aspect of this.
The typo was in the 'What you should see once you've followed the Steps To Reproduce section to the letter'.
There were three outcomes: one major, && then two other of secondary importance.

The mistake was in one of those two secondary ones where I wrote 'A' instead of 'B'.

The best thing about that was that the secondary result isn't even that important.

The thing on which people should be focused is the _root cause_ of the issue. The thing occurring just before the issue is encountered. Once that thing is fixed, it is of no significance whether my mistake was there - that behavior is still gone as part of the fix.

So yeah... working w/ some credit grabbing fucks.